Friday 4 January 2019

I've got a cunning plan...

Or rather, I've downloaded a cunning plan. A plan hopefully even more cunning than Baldrick's one that was as cunning as a fox that has just been appointed Professor of Cunning at Oxford university. It's a plan to get me over the finish line of the London Marathon in four months' time in more or less one piece.
Ever since I excitedly announced I'd got into this year's event, experienced runners have been telling me to get a training plan. "Which plan are you on?" I keep getting asked, or "Have you decided on a plan?". It's almost as if I'm preparing to give birth. Now I'm not much of a believer in rigid training plans, as I know I'm not great at sticking to them. Until now I've managed to get by with a training schedule that is effectively:
Week 1 - a) Run as far as you can, b) Weep, c) Think about giving up
Week 2 - a) Run a bit further than last week, b) Over-estimate the rate of your improvement
And so on and so on.
But this marathon business is a bit more serious it seems. So I've given in and chosen one. It's called Run Less, Run Faster and I have to admit I was particularly attracted by the "Run Less" part of the title. Though it turns out it doesn't involve running any less than I do at the moment, it just means doing it a bit more scientifically.
The 18-week plan, which I really should have begun on Christmas Eve in order to complete it before race day, revolves around three runs a week. The first one involves fairly intense interval training, run at a pace 45 seconds a mile faster than your fastest 10k pace - which for me means about 7.45 mins per mile (which is roughly 5 mins per km, which is OK when you're running minute-long intervals, but is a bit harder for longer periods).
The second is called a "tempo" run, and is apparently the most useful of them all. It starts off with an easy 1 or 2 mile bit, followed by between 2 and 5 miles at "tempo" or "threshold" pace - slightly slower than your fastest 10k pace but faster than normal training pace. For me that entails running for several miles at about 9 minutes per mile (about 5.38 mins per km). 
The third is a long run, starting at 8 miles and working up to 20, at training pace (for me, 9.15 mins per mile, or 5.47 mins per km). Even at that pace, which is comfortable, that's a long hard  3-4 hour slog.
Now all this sounds almost reasonable, at least to start with. But there's a twist. You're also supposed to be doing cross-training workouts on your days off. Days off are when I normally try to recover from the run the day before by hobbling around like a 90-year-old with mobility issues. I think I also saw something about following a proper diet, which is also not going to happen.
Anyway, I've already started, sort of, with an 8-mile run, followed about my first tempo run about a week later. A further attempt at running 9 miles was not a huge success - at the moment, it seems, I'm doing one decent run followed by a bad one. This week, however, we really start in earnest. I'll let you know how it goes

Top 10 Tips for the Big Day

 I'm revisiting and updating this blog to help support one of this year's London marathon entrants who's currently preparing for...